The University of Maryland Terrapins will remember Super Bowl weekend 2010 for the snow, and the beating they provided to defending National Champion North Carolina.
With the win, Maryland moves to 16-6 overall, and 6-2 in the Atlantic Coast Conference. The Terps will enter the 2nd-half of their conference schedule, one-half game behind Duke for the conference lead.
The win was Maryland's fourth win over the Tar Heels in as many years, and brings the Terps record against UNC to 16-17 overall since January 1995.
The Good:
1) UNC might be leaving College Park with 10 total losses (including 6 in the ACC) but their uniform still reads North Carolina, and there is plenty of talent on that team. After losing to Virginia Tech Thursday night, the Tar Heels headed straight to Maryland. They were a desperate team, that got to solely focus on the Terps for the last few days. I expected to see a lot of fight out UNC today, and a game that went down to the final minutes. While Maryland allowed a few large leads to be wilted down, the Terps were in total control of this game from the start. The Terps deserve credit for being mentally prepared, and taking care of business.
2) Maryland shot 51.5% from the floor today, with 42 points in the paint. All the numbers about MD's shooting prowess, really goes back to the Terps having the right mindset of attacking inside.
3) I personally do not like seeing the Terps take 23 three-point attempts, but give Maryland credit for hitting 12 of those attempts. Despite the numbers that say otherwise, the Terps are really not a great shooting team. What they are - and what they showed today - is team that is pretty lethal when those shots from outside fall. Vasquez, and Hayes combined to make 10 three-pointers today, and that was a result of how hard they work without the ball.
4) Maryland had 5 different players with at-least 4 rebounds today. The Terps playing even with UNC on the boards is about effort.
5) Beyond Vasquez's three-point shooting today, he also had 11 assists, 5 boards, a steal, and a block. It bothers me that he is not 'loved' more by all Terp fans. You might not love some of the decision making of his, but you can never fault his effort.
6) Very nice game for the reserves Gregory, Tucker, and Bowie. Each of them played hard, and brought something to the table today. Overall, they combined for 18 points, 7 assists, 6 boards, and a block. Gregory in-particular deserves credit for how he ran the court today.
6a) With the lead well in-hand, Padgett was able to get 7 minutes of good-time today.
7) Milbourne again filled up the stat line with 15 points, 5 boards, 3 steals, and 3 blocks. If he had finished that one slam, he would have added another Youtube classic to his resume.
8) Hayes only took 6 shots, but knocked down four 3-pointers. Also had 4 boards, and 5 assists. As Mike Gminski noted, when Hayes hits outside shots, it is a long day for the opposition.
9) Jordan Williams had a bit of rough go of it today, but still finished with 8 points, 6 boards, 2 steals, and a block. Besides his hands, strength, size, and positioning; you have to love his willingness to run the court.
10) Mosley was having a quiet game, but started looking for his shot late and finished 4 of 5 from the floor. Beyond his 8 points, he had 5 rebounds, 3 assists, and 2 steals. It was good to see him finish strong, especially with the emphatic slam to end the game.
11) A North Carolina team with a lot of offensive-weapons, and size; was held to 38% from the floor, and 26 points in the paint. Outstanding team defense from Maryland.
The Bad:
1) The Terps hit 83% of their foul-shots today, but were only able to get to the line 12 times. Part of the reason for that, is Maryland was not looking to force contact inside, and was taking a large amount of outside jumpers.
The Ugly:
1) None. Maryland beat a conference-foe by 21 points, with 7 players scoring at-least 7 points. They had strong results on the offensive, and defensive end. Hard to call anything ugly based on that.
Up-Next:
The Terps get to host Sylven Landesberg and 5-3 University of Virginia on Wednesday night. Unlike the Tar Heels who want to run, Cavs Coach Tony Bennet is very comfortable slowing the tempo.
If Virginia has their way, this will be a grind-it-out affair, where the winning team scores in the high 60's to low 70's.
In the Cavs three wins against ranked opponents (UAB, Georgia Tech, and Miami) this year, they have averaged 76 points, while allowing an average of 65.
The strength of Virginia is the depth of their guards (Landesberg, Zeglinski, Farrakhan, Jones etc). This means the game against the Terps will essentially be strength vs. strength.
If Maryland can win, it would set-up a game at Duke next Saturday, which could be for the conference lead. The Blue Devils will host North Carolina Wednesday night. Besides the potential to play for the conference lead, the Terps will be looking to avenge their 3 losses to Duke last-season, including the demolishing they took in their 41 point loss at Cameron Indoor last year.
This past-week against FSU, and UNC went a long way to punching Maryland's ticket back to the NCAA Tournament. This coming-week can go a long way to establishing just what the Terps might do, when they get back to that dance.
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Credit to The Sun, and Testudo Times
It was a bit of a busy week, and I was not able to post as I would have liked to.
What I was able to do, was read some outstanding coverage of signing-day for the Maryland Football team from Matt Bracken with The Baltimore Sun, and the guys at Testudo Times.
Links to some of the reports from both are below. Kudos to both for their efforts.
Baltimore Sun / Matt Bracken
http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/sports/college/recruiting/2010/02/superlatives_for_the_terps_class_of_2010.html
Testudo Times
http://www.testudotimes.com/2010/2/3/1291535/maryland-signing-day-2010
According to Rivals.com, this was the 37th ranked class in the country.
http://maryland.rivals.com/teamrank.asp?Year=2010&Page=2&PosType=0&Sort=0
Based off of the season Maryland had on the field, this was an exceptional class.
What excited me most, is that Rivals ranked the Terps class 14th overall in terms of Defensive Ends. It is my hope that after a year of prep-school, David Mackall is ready to hit the field immediately for Maryland.
I am looking at a Defensive Line that looks like:
DE: Derek Drummond, DeOnte Arnett, Isaiah Ross
NT: AJ Francis, Masengo Kabongo
DT: Zack Kerr, Joe Vellano
Anchor: Carl Russell, Justin Anderson, David Mackall
If Mackall, and Arnett can emerge to help provide a regular pass-rush from the DE's, as opposed to having to use LB's, and the Secondary as extra-blitzers, that will help the team as a whole.
The starting safeties figure to be Kenny Tate, and Antwin Perez, with Eric Franklin backing them up. I would imagine that Titus Till will get a chance to jump into the 2-deep during camp.
What I was able to do, was read some outstanding coverage of signing-day for the Maryland Football team from Matt Bracken with The Baltimore Sun, and the guys at Testudo Times.
Links to some of the reports from both are below. Kudos to both for their efforts.
Baltimore Sun / Matt Bracken
http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/sports/college/recruiting/2010/02/superlatives_for_the_terps_class_of_2010.html
Testudo Times
http://www.testudotimes.com/2010/2/3/1291535/maryland-signing-day-2010
According to Rivals.com, this was the 37th ranked class in the country.
http://maryland.rivals.com/teamrank.asp?Year=2010&Page=2&PosType=0&Sort=0
Based off of the season Maryland had on the field, this was an exceptional class.
What excited me most, is that Rivals ranked the Terps class 14th overall in terms of Defensive Ends. It is my hope that after a year of prep-school, David Mackall is ready to hit the field immediately for Maryland.
I am looking at a Defensive Line that looks like:
DE: Derek Drummond, DeOnte Arnett, Isaiah Ross
NT: AJ Francis, Masengo Kabongo
DT: Zack Kerr, Joe Vellano
Anchor: Carl Russell, Justin Anderson, David Mackall
If Mackall, and Arnett can emerge to help provide a regular pass-rush from the DE's, as opposed to having to use LB's, and the Secondary as extra-blitzers, that will help the team as a whole.
The starting safeties figure to be Kenny Tate, and Antwin Perez, with Eric Franklin backing them up. I would imagine that Titus Till will get a chance to jump into the 2-deep during camp.
One final post on Terrence Ross
It was announced this week that former University of Maryland verbal Terrence Ross has decided to leave Montrose Christian. The Washington Post's Steve Yanda reported the likely destination for Ross was Westwind Academy in Phoenix.
Leaving Montrose, and their Head Coach Stu Vetter; is probably the final nail in the coffin, for Ross becoming a Terrapin.
Vetter sends players to colleges across the country, but has sent Vasquez, Bowie, and Shane Walker to Maryland in recent years (and previously Terrence Morris). Vetter is big on commitment, and has a strong relationship with Gary Williams. He would have supported Ross through the process of reopening his recruiting, but would have continued to be a strong advocate for the Terps.
With Vetter publicly stating this was a personal decision made by the family, my read is that the family knows Ross will not be attending Maryland, and did not want to hear the opinion of Vetter any longer.
I wrote previously about Ross ( http://baltimoresportsandlife.blogspot.com/2010/01/terrence-ross-discussion.html ) and I still ultimately come to the same opinions.
It appears now Ross will definitively not be a Terp. Well, that happens. He is a high-school kid, that will probably change his own mind of where he wants to go 1,000,000 times between now and when he signs with someone in the Spring.
For obvious reasons I hope he does not wind-up at Duke, but if he does, he does. I continue to see comments from others blaming Gary Williams for Ross not honoring his verbal. I just do not understand that point of view.
When Ross gave his verbal, he said it was Maryland that had recruited him the hardest. All Gary Williams can do is sell his program, and provide a vision to a prospect. Williams did a good enough job doing that, that Ross gave his verbal commitment.
Ross is a young kid, with the future on his door-step. He is allowed to change his mind, and do what he thinks is best for him. Going from a somewhat unknown Top 100 recruit, to a Top 30 recruit, does changes things. If that forces him to look elsewhere, it sucks, but that is beyond the control of Maryland.
Frankly, the only person I feel bad for is incoming Freshman Mychal Parker. Part of the reason Parker signed with Maryland, is so he could team with Ross.
While I respect that Ross has to do what is right for him, and understand that HS kids change their minds; I think it was a mistake to ever give his verbal, and help recruit Parker if he was not 100% committed.
I think the Terps have done a good job of controlling what they can control. When Ross did not sign, they adjusted and signed Howard. Howard is described as having the intensity, and drive of Vasquez, and is gaining the benefit of playing for National power Oak Hill.
On the court, the Terps are heading into the 2nd-half of the ACC schedule, well positioned to make the tournament for the 3rd time in 4 seasons.
Who knows, maybe Stoglin will be able to change Ross's mind once again, out there in the Arizona desert. I kid, I kid.
The bottom-line is that Maryland clearly would have been/would be better with Ross signed. However, things work out like they work out. People playing the 'blame game', just miss the point. Ross to Maryland just did not work out, and you move on.
The future for the Terps is bright, with or without Ross in a Maryland uniform.
2010-11 Terps
1) Bowie (Senior), Stoglin (Frosh)
2) Tucker (Senior), Howard (Frosh)
3) Mosley (Junior), Parker (Frosh)
4) Padgett (Soph), Pankey (Frosh)
5) Williams (Soph), Gregory (Senior), Goins (Junior)
Even if Bowie is not a true PG, his experience, size, quickness, and ability to drive should position him to start as the lead guard. (at-least to start the year). Having Stoglin, and Howard available to back him up as ball-handlers should help. Mosley and Williams will have plenty of experience, and should be ready to contribute as focal points of the team. Gregory, Padgett, and Pankey can be expected to provide athleticism, rebounding, an a defensive presence. Maybe Goins leaves, and maybe he does not.
Either way, you can expect that Maryland will add at-least one more big which will help out the rotation at the PF, and Center positions.
Leaving Montrose, and their Head Coach Stu Vetter; is probably the final nail in the coffin, for Ross becoming a Terrapin.
Vetter sends players to colleges across the country, but has sent Vasquez, Bowie, and Shane Walker to Maryland in recent years (and previously Terrence Morris). Vetter is big on commitment, and has a strong relationship with Gary Williams. He would have supported Ross through the process of reopening his recruiting, but would have continued to be a strong advocate for the Terps.
With Vetter publicly stating this was a personal decision made by the family, my read is that the family knows Ross will not be attending Maryland, and did not want to hear the opinion of Vetter any longer.
I wrote previously about Ross ( http://baltimoresportsandlife.blogspot.com/2010/01/terrence-ross-discussion.html ) and I still ultimately come to the same opinions.
It appears now Ross will definitively not be a Terp. Well, that happens. He is a high-school kid, that will probably change his own mind of where he wants to go 1,000,000 times between now and when he signs with someone in the Spring.
For obvious reasons I hope he does not wind-up at Duke, but if he does, he does. I continue to see comments from others blaming Gary Williams for Ross not honoring his verbal. I just do not understand that point of view.
When Ross gave his verbal, he said it was Maryland that had recruited him the hardest. All Gary Williams can do is sell his program, and provide a vision to a prospect. Williams did a good enough job doing that, that Ross gave his verbal commitment.
Ross is a young kid, with the future on his door-step. He is allowed to change his mind, and do what he thinks is best for him. Going from a somewhat unknown Top 100 recruit, to a Top 30 recruit, does changes things. If that forces him to look elsewhere, it sucks, but that is beyond the control of Maryland.
Frankly, the only person I feel bad for is incoming Freshman Mychal Parker. Part of the reason Parker signed with Maryland, is so he could team with Ross.
While I respect that Ross has to do what is right for him, and understand that HS kids change their minds; I think it was a mistake to ever give his verbal, and help recruit Parker if he was not 100% committed.
I think the Terps have done a good job of controlling what they can control. When Ross did not sign, they adjusted and signed Howard. Howard is described as having the intensity, and drive of Vasquez, and is gaining the benefit of playing for National power Oak Hill.
On the court, the Terps are heading into the 2nd-half of the ACC schedule, well positioned to make the tournament for the 3rd time in 4 seasons.
Who knows, maybe Stoglin will be able to change Ross's mind once again, out there in the Arizona desert. I kid, I kid.
The bottom-line is that Maryland clearly would have been/would be better with Ross signed. However, things work out like they work out. People playing the 'blame game', just miss the point. Ross to Maryland just did not work out, and you move on.
The future for the Terps is bright, with or without Ross in a Maryland uniform.
2010-11 Terps
1) Bowie (Senior), Stoglin (Frosh)
2) Tucker (Senior), Howard (Frosh)
3) Mosley (Junior), Parker (Frosh)
4) Padgett (Soph), Pankey (Frosh)
5) Williams (Soph), Gregory (Senior), Goins (Junior)
Even if Bowie is not a true PG, his experience, size, quickness, and ability to drive should position him to start as the lead guard. (at-least to start the year). Having Stoglin, and Howard available to back him up as ball-handlers should help. Mosley and Williams will have plenty of experience, and should be ready to contribute as focal points of the team. Gregory, Padgett, and Pankey can be expected to provide athleticism, rebounding, an a defensive presence. Maybe Goins leaves, and maybe he does not.
Either way, you can expect that Maryland will add at-least one more big which will help out the rotation at the PF, and Center positions.
Bedard back to Seattle; Thoughts on existing rotation
The U.S.S. Mariner and Dave Cameron have reported that Bedard has confirmed a deal to return to Seattle.
http://ussmariner.com/2010/02/05/bedard-confirms-deal/
I read this situation wrong, as I thought a return to the Orioles was going to happen. Roch Kubatko and MASN reported yesterday that the O's did make an offer in-line to Seattle's offer, but that Bedard choose the Mariners. I guess that is understandable with the bigger ball-park, outstanding defense, offered by Seattle. By Bedard's own admission, there is less pressure being the 3rd starter in a rotation that features Hernandez, and Lee.
Clearly everyone in Baltimore is aware that Bedard never particularly relished the spot-light, or responsibility of leading a rotation.
Despite that, I thought signing Bedard now had the potential to pay dividends this season. If he returned to health (and performance) between May - July, it could have provided additional options to the rotation.
However, the same thing that made him available (his health), is the same thing that made signing him a gamble. Will he ever be ready to pitch in 2010? Even if he does, will he be effective? If you signed him for 2010 alone, would you be signing him to just rehab with you, and give starts to someone else in 2011?
Well, those are all questions the O's do not have to worry about now.
The focus goes back to what you have on the staff today, and there are plenty of positives.
The Orioles opened 2009 with a rotation of Guthrie, Uehara, Simon, Hendrickson, and Eaton.
The Orioles will open 2010 with a rotation of Millwood, Matusz, Guthrie, Bergesen, and Tillman.
If you can not see the obvious improvement, that is on you.
While I think you can project those 5 starters to provide you with 790 innings or so of work, the reality is that things happen (injuries, performance issues) during the course of a season. Besides being optimistic about the existing rotation, I am excited by the volume of internal options that exist to supplement the current rotation.
Arrieta
Hernandez
Berken
Uehara
Hendrickson
Patton
Erbe
Britton
That is a pretty strong stable of arms that could be capable of aiding the rotation if needed.
There is a multitude of reasons why the O's have crashed and burned with regularity during the 2nd-half of seasons. My favorite two reasons are the increase of division games, and the pitching-staff tiring out during the dog-days of summer.
Typically the staff has started a season being thin to begin with. This has forced the bullpen to work a bunch of innings early in the year, and when summer comes; they have already reached a breaking point.
This year, not only is the starting rotation improved, which should help save the bullpen; the bullpen itself is improved by adding pitchers who have the capability of pitching more innings. Adding Hernandez, Berken, and Uehara to the bullpen is a tremendous improvement. It would be a shame to me, if Hernandez or Berken were sent back to start at AAA.
http://ussmariner.com/2010/02/05/bedard-confirms-deal/
I read this situation wrong, as I thought a return to the Orioles was going to happen. Roch Kubatko and MASN reported yesterday that the O's did make an offer in-line to Seattle's offer, but that Bedard choose the Mariners. I guess that is understandable with the bigger ball-park, outstanding defense, offered by Seattle. By Bedard's own admission, there is less pressure being the 3rd starter in a rotation that features Hernandez, and Lee.
Clearly everyone in Baltimore is aware that Bedard never particularly relished the spot-light, or responsibility of leading a rotation.
Despite that, I thought signing Bedard now had the potential to pay dividends this season. If he returned to health (and performance) between May - July, it could have provided additional options to the rotation.
However, the same thing that made him available (his health), is the same thing that made signing him a gamble. Will he ever be ready to pitch in 2010? Even if he does, will he be effective? If you signed him for 2010 alone, would you be signing him to just rehab with you, and give starts to someone else in 2011?
Well, those are all questions the O's do not have to worry about now.
The focus goes back to what you have on the staff today, and there are plenty of positives.
The Orioles opened 2009 with a rotation of Guthrie, Uehara, Simon, Hendrickson, and Eaton.
The Orioles will open 2010 with a rotation of Millwood, Matusz, Guthrie, Bergesen, and Tillman.
If you can not see the obvious improvement, that is on you.
While I think you can project those 5 starters to provide you with 790 innings or so of work, the reality is that things happen (injuries, performance issues) during the course of a season. Besides being optimistic about the existing rotation, I am excited by the volume of internal options that exist to supplement the current rotation.
Arrieta
Hernandez
Berken
Uehara
Hendrickson
Patton
Erbe
Britton
That is a pretty strong stable of arms that could be capable of aiding the rotation if needed.
There is a multitude of reasons why the O's have crashed and burned with regularity during the 2nd-half of seasons. My favorite two reasons are the increase of division games, and the pitching-staff tiring out during the dog-days of summer.
Typically the staff has started a season being thin to begin with. This has forced the bullpen to work a bunch of innings early in the year, and when summer comes; they have already reached a breaking point.
This year, not only is the starting rotation improved, which should help save the bullpen; the bullpen itself is improved by adding pitchers who have the capability of pitching more innings. Adding Hernandez, Berken, and Uehara to the bullpen is a tremendous improvement. It would be a shame to me, if Hernandez or Berken were sent back to start at AAA.
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Terps grab 15th win; The Good, The Bad, The Ugly
In the state capital of Florida, the University of Maryland improved to 15-6 overall, and 5-2 in the ACC, as the Terps won their second-game against the Seminoles of Florida State.
While Maryland was just 26 of 61 (43%) from the floor, the win served as a testament to the adage that defense, and effort travels anywhere.
The Good:
1) Maryland limited FSU to 38% from the floor, and the Terps had 6 steals, 6 blocks, and forced 14 turnovers. On a night when the Terps had trouble scoring, they were able to rely on their defense to help win them the game.
2) I can not say enough about Jordan Williams. 7 for 11 from the floor, for 14 points, 6 boards, and 2 blocks. He is a perfect option of Gary Williams' flex offense, as he eats space, moves without the ball, catches in traffic, and knows how to finish. Also, whenever he does miss, he typically shows tremendous second-effort in getting the ball back, and going-up strong. Frankly I am surprised he only finished with 6 boards, as he seemed to rip the ball out of the sky with regularity tonight.
3) Maryland fans get the rap of being classless, but it was Seminole fans who had signs suggesting Vasquez should be deported. Vasquez got the last-laugh, as he finished with 23 points, 7 boards, 7 assists, and got his second win over FSU this season.
4) Tonight was a night where Milbourne's speed was too much for the opposing PF to deal with. FSU had match-up problems with Milbourne the entire night, and Landon finished with 18 points, 6 boards, 3 steals, and 3 blocks (including 1 on Alabi). The Terps are a different team when Milbourne scores.
5) Hayes missed his first three 3-pointers, but came-back to hit 2 of his next 3. What I liked is that after he missed those opening 3's, he made a point of taking a short-jumper from the foul-line. 12 points, and 5 boards for Hayes tonight.
6) Gregory did not have a great night, but you have to credit him for the defensive plays he made taking charges, and for hitting two clutch foul-shots late.
7) Gary Williams made the absolute right call by fouling FSU with a 3 point-lead in the closing seconds.
8) I will get to Mosley's offense below, but credit him for 4 points, 3 assists, 2 steals, and a block. Even when the ball is not in his hands, he still plays every possession.
9) It is never easy to win on the road, and the Terps obtained a victory against a quality opponent.
9a) After 26 turnovers against Clemson, just 11 tonight against FSU.
9b) Maryland hit 16 of their 20 foul-shots, which is an impressive showing on the road.
The Bad:
1) It is mind-boggling to me that Mosley can finish a game with 4 shots. You are 20 games into the season, and he is shooting about 57%. His teammates have to look for him, and he has to be less passive and look for his shot.
2) Padgett played 1 minute, during which he grabbed a board, and hit one foul-shot. Gregory played 13 minutes, and had 2 rebounds. Maybe Padgett would not have picked-up the charges that Gregory did, but I think he can help with rebounding. In Padgett's 11.9 minutes a game, he averages 3.6 boards, while Gregory averages 3.8 boards in 20.8 minutes. That said, it is fair to point out that Padgett's minutes were typically against the little sisters of the poor, and Gregory's minutes have come in large part against the ACC.
3) 21 combined minutes for Tucker, and Bowie tonight, and they finished with 0 points, and 3 rebounds. When they do not provide production off the bench, Maryland is really forced to scrape, and claw to win. FSU's Singleton made a tremendous block on Bowie, but Bowie needed to go stronger at the rim. He expected the layup/slam to be uncontested, and he went in a bit slow.
4) Vasquez redeemed himself by making 4 critical foul-shots in the last minute, but I hated his 3 point attempt with 47 seconds left on the clock. There was about 15 seconds on the shot-clock when he hoisted that attempt, and those seconds should have been milked with the 2 point lead.
The Ugly:
None.
Up-Next:
Maryland is scheduled to host defending National Champion North Carolina this Sunday at Comcast. You have to wonder if the weather is going to result in that game being canceled. As the Tar Heels were in Virginia Tech tonight (a 74-70 loss to fall to 13-9 overall, and 2-5 in the ACC) maybe UNC will just head-up to College Park tonight.
If the game is played, will anyone but students be able to attend? What type of atmosphere will there be at Comcast? If the Tar Heels do not head back to Chapel Hill, and spend the next couple of days in a hotel preparing for Maryland, maybe that helps their focus?
It is an important game for the Terps. At this point, Maryland has to look at their schedule and say this is a game we need to win at-home.
If the game is played, I personally expect to see a lot of pride out of UNC Sunday. The Terps have had success against UNC in recent seasons, because the style of play Roy Williams likes (constantly pushing the ball) allows for the Terps to play the transition game they thrive in.
Larry Drew is taking a lot of abuse for a guy averaging 9 points, 44% from 3 point land, and 6.2 assists per game. That said, he does not possess the quickness of Raymond Felton, or Ty Lawson, and I think is being hurt by the constant up-tempo offense of Roy Williams.
One match-up I will really enjoy watching is Jordan Williams vs. Ed Davis in the post.
While Maryland was just 26 of 61 (43%) from the floor, the win served as a testament to the adage that defense, and effort travels anywhere.
The Good:
1) Maryland limited FSU to 38% from the floor, and the Terps had 6 steals, 6 blocks, and forced 14 turnovers. On a night when the Terps had trouble scoring, they were able to rely on their defense to help win them the game.
2) I can not say enough about Jordan Williams. 7 for 11 from the floor, for 14 points, 6 boards, and 2 blocks. He is a perfect option of Gary Williams' flex offense, as he eats space, moves without the ball, catches in traffic, and knows how to finish. Also, whenever he does miss, he typically shows tremendous second-effort in getting the ball back, and going-up strong. Frankly I am surprised he only finished with 6 boards, as he seemed to rip the ball out of the sky with regularity tonight.
3) Maryland fans get the rap of being classless, but it was Seminole fans who had signs suggesting Vasquez should be deported. Vasquez got the last-laugh, as he finished with 23 points, 7 boards, 7 assists, and got his second win over FSU this season.
4) Tonight was a night where Milbourne's speed was too much for the opposing PF to deal with. FSU had match-up problems with Milbourne the entire night, and Landon finished with 18 points, 6 boards, 3 steals, and 3 blocks (including 1 on Alabi). The Terps are a different team when Milbourne scores.
5) Hayes missed his first three 3-pointers, but came-back to hit 2 of his next 3. What I liked is that after he missed those opening 3's, he made a point of taking a short-jumper from the foul-line. 12 points, and 5 boards for Hayes tonight.
6) Gregory did not have a great night, but you have to credit him for the defensive plays he made taking charges, and for hitting two clutch foul-shots late.
7) Gary Williams made the absolute right call by fouling FSU with a 3 point-lead in the closing seconds.
8) I will get to Mosley's offense below, but credit him for 4 points, 3 assists, 2 steals, and a block. Even when the ball is not in his hands, he still plays every possession.
9) It is never easy to win on the road, and the Terps obtained a victory against a quality opponent.
9a) After 26 turnovers against Clemson, just 11 tonight against FSU.
9b) Maryland hit 16 of their 20 foul-shots, which is an impressive showing on the road.
The Bad:
1) It is mind-boggling to me that Mosley can finish a game with 4 shots. You are 20 games into the season, and he is shooting about 57%. His teammates have to look for him, and he has to be less passive and look for his shot.
2) Padgett played 1 minute, during which he grabbed a board, and hit one foul-shot. Gregory played 13 minutes, and had 2 rebounds. Maybe Padgett would not have picked-up the charges that Gregory did, but I think he can help with rebounding. In Padgett's 11.9 minutes a game, he averages 3.6 boards, while Gregory averages 3.8 boards in 20.8 minutes. That said, it is fair to point out that Padgett's minutes were typically against the little sisters of the poor, and Gregory's minutes have come in large part against the ACC.
3) 21 combined minutes for Tucker, and Bowie tonight, and they finished with 0 points, and 3 rebounds. When they do not provide production off the bench, Maryland is really forced to scrape, and claw to win. FSU's Singleton made a tremendous block on Bowie, but Bowie needed to go stronger at the rim. He expected the layup/slam to be uncontested, and he went in a bit slow.
4) Vasquez redeemed himself by making 4 critical foul-shots in the last minute, but I hated his 3 point attempt with 47 seconds left on the clock. There was about 15 seconds on the shot-clock when he hoisted that attempt, and those seconds should have been milked with the 2 point lead.
The Ugly:
None.
Up-Next:
Maryland is scheduled to host defending National Champion North Carolina this Sunday at Comcast. You have to wonder if the weather is going to result in that game being canceled. As the Tar Heels were in Virginia Tech tonight (a 74-70 loss to fall to 13-9 overall, and 2-5 in the ACC) maybe UNC will just head-up to College Park tonight.
If the game is played, will anyone but students be able to attend? What type of atmosphere will there be at Comcast? If the Tar Heels do not head back to Chapel Hill, and spend the next couple of days in a hotel preparing for Maryland, maybe that helps their focus?
It is an important game for the Terps. At this point, Maryland has to look at their schedule and say this is a game we need to win at-home.
If the game is played, I personally expect to see a lot of pride out of UNC Sunday. The Terps have had success against UNC in recent seasons, because the style of play Roy Williams likes (constantly pushing the ball) allows for the Terps to play the transition game they thrive in.
Larry Drew is taking a lot of abuse for a guy averaging 9 points, 44% from 3 point land, and 6.2 assists per game. That said, he does not possess the quickness of Raymond Felton, or Ty Lawson, and I think is being hurt by the constant up-tempo offense of Roy Williams.
One match-up I will really enjoy watching is Jordan Williams vs. Ed Davis in the post.
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Terps lose to Clemson; The Good, The Bad, The Ugly
The University of Maryland Terrapins fell to 14-6 overall, and 4-2 in the Atlantic Coast Conference with a 62-53 loss to the Clemson Tigers today.
It was an ugly game from start to finish, and a game the Terps will regret for some time.
There is no shame to losing to a strong, physical team like Clemson on their home-floor. There is plenty to regret when you have 26 total turnovers, and consistently hurt your own chances for getting back into the game.
The Good:
1) When the Terps review the game-film, the only player that will be able to feel good about their performance is Jordan Williams. The Freshman finished with 13 points, 13 boards, 2 blocks, and 2 steals. He played strong defense on Trevor Booker for the entire game. Maryland was quickly down 13-4, and Williams responded with a sequence where he got a needed board, made 2 free-throws, made a jumper, got another board, got a block, and got another board. Without his play tonight, the Terps would have had zero chance in this game. His one-handed flush was also pretty, and would get more time on the highlight-reels if Maryland had won.
2) Maryland was 15 of 17 from the foul-line, which helped keep them in the game.
3) 10 steals, and 7 blocks for the Terps, and they also kept Clemson to just 31.9% from the floor.
4) As bad as Maryland played, they battled back from a 11 point second-half deficit, on the road based on the strength of their defense, and will.
The Bad:
1) Vasquez, Mosley, and Milbourne combined for 21 total points, going 7 of 27 from the floor. The Terps can deal with any one of those 3 not scoring in a particular game. If all 3 of those players do not score, Maryland can not win.
2) Gregory contributed with 4 points, 3 boards, and a block; but I think it was a mistake to keep Padgett on the bench tonight. Once it became apparent that Milbourne was going to have a game where he struggled to score; having that bigger body come in off the bench that could help with the rebounding, and defense against Jerai Grant should have occurred.
3) Bowie, and Tucker combined for 30 minutes, 4 points, on 1 of 9 shooting. At their best, they provided a bit of defense. At their worst, they were forcing shots that were not there.
The Ugly:
1) They say that teams that like to play pressure defense, hate to be pressured. Well that axiom certainly looked accurate for Maryland tonight. You could understand with the up and down pace that the turnovers would increase. 26 turnovers is just mind-boggling ugly. For the Senior Guards Vasquez, and Hayes to have a combined 14 turnovers against that pressure is the definition of ugly. They needed to get the Terps into solid looks, and were unable to get Maryland into their offense.
2) I gave the Terps credit for battling back and finding a way to be in the game late. However, the reality is Maryland was gaining attention for their start to conference play, and they lost that positive momentum with their performance tonight.
Up-Next:
Maryland heads to Tallahassee, for a Thursday night showdown against Florida State. The Terps beat the Seminoles 77-68 in College Park a few weeks ago, with Vasquez, and Hayes combining for 39 points.
Vasquez commented after that game, that the win felt good because the Terps played 'Maryland basketball.' As Terp fans, lets hope that Maryland can again find that formula.
If you can get the win there, the Terps will be in good shape at 5-2 in conference, with a visit from defending National Champion North Carolina looming on Super Bowl Sunday.
It was an ugly game from start to finish, and a game the Terps will regret for some time.
There is no shame to losing to a strong, physical team like Clemson on their home-floor. There is plenty to regret when you have 26 total turnovers, and consistently hurt your own chances for getting back into the game.
The Good:
1) When the Terps review the game-film, the only player that will be able to feel good about their performance is Jordan Williams. The Freshman finished with 13 points, 13 boards, 2 blocks, and 2 steals. He played strong defense on Trevor Booker for the entire game. Maryland was quickly down 13-4, and Williams responded with a sequence where he got a needed board, made 2 free-throws, made a jumper, got another board, got a block, and got another board. Without his play tonight, the Terps would have had zero chance in this game. His one-handed flush was also pretty, and would get more time on the highlight-reels if Maryland had won.
2) Maryland was 15 of 17 from the foul-line, which helped keep them in the game.
3) 10 steals, and 7 blocks for the Terps, and they also kept Clemson to just 31.9% from the floor.
4) As bad as Maryland played, they battled back from a 11 point second-half deficit, on the road based on the strength of their defense, and will.
The Bad:
1) Vasquez, Mosley, and Milbourne combined for 21 total points, going 7 of 27 from the floor. The Terps can deal with any one of those 3 not scoring in a particular game. If all 3 of those players do not score, Maryland can not win.
2) Gregory contributed with 4 points, 3 boards, and a block; but I think it was a mistake to keep Padgett on the bench tonight. Once it became apparent that Milbourne was going to have a game where he struggled to score; having that bigger body come in off the bench that could help with the rebounding, and defense against Jerai Grant should have occurred.
3) Bowie, and Tucker combined for 30 minutes, 4 points, on 1 of 9 shooting. At their best, they provided a bit of defense. At their worst, they were forcing shots that were not there.
The Ugly:
1) They say that teams that like to play pressure defense, hate to be pressured. Well that axiom certainly looked accurate for Maryland tonight. You could understand with the up and down pace that the turnovers would increase. 26 turnovers is just mind-boggling ugly. For the Senior Guards Vasquez, and Hayes to have a combined 14 turnovers against that pressure is the definition of ugly. They needed to get the Terps into solid looks, and were unable to get Maryland into their offense.
2) I gave the Terps credit for battling back and finding a way to be in the game late. However, the reality is Maryland was gaining attention for their start to conference play, and they lost that positive momentum with their performance tonight.
Up-Next:
Maryland heads to Tallahassee, for a Thursday night showdown against Florida State. The Terps beat the Seminoles 77-68 in College Park a few weeks ago, with Vasquez, and Hayes combining for 39 points.
Vasquez commented after that game, that the win felt good because the Terps played 'Maryland basketball.' As Terp fans, lets hope that Maryland can again find that formula.
If you can get the win there, the Terps will be in good shape at 5-2 in conference, with a visit from defending National Champion North Carolina looming on Super Bowl Sunday.
Friday, January 29, 2010
A few more questions with Mr. Joe Jordan, Director of Amateur Scouting of The Baltimore Orioles
Last January, Mr. Joe Jordan – the Director of Amateur Scouting for The Baltimore Orioles – joined Baltimore Sports and Life for a Q&A. You can find a link to that interview here:
http://baltimoresportsandlife.blogspot.com/2009/01/few-questions-with-mr-joe-jordan.html
Since that time, Mr. Jordan has seen at-least 5 more former draft-picks (Berken, Hernandez, Reimold, Wieters, and Matusz) ascend to the Majors.
In the June Amateur Draft, the Orioles selected Matt Hobgood 5th overall in the 1st round.
Baltimore Sports and Life appreciates Mr. Jordan again taking the time to answer a few questions, as we look back on 2009, and ahead to 2010.
Baltimore Sports and Life: “After you selected Matt Hobgood, you immediately stated in several interviews that the pick had zero to do with sign-ability, it was about drafting the player you had identifed as wanting. I think that is an important distinction, and I was glad to see you make that known. No matter what the Monday Morning Quarterbacks (myself included) have to say, you are the one being held responsible for the decision. I think you deserve a lot of credit for taking the player you identified, instead of taking a known ‘name’, you were less comfortable with. Can you speak to the comfort you get, in selecting the player you wanted, vs. a player you might have felt left with?”
Mr. Joe Jordan: “As a staff we put a lot of time and effort in evaluating players. It only makes sense to take the player “WE” want in each round. In the end we will make good decisions and some will not work out. I don’t worry for a second what the so called experts think – I trust the people in my draft room much more than someone from the outside evaluating our work.”
Baltimore Sports and Life: “Did you get the chance to see Hobgood in Bluefield? I know it is a decision for the Player Development Department, but do you think Hobgood will have the opportunity to start 2010 in the Delmarva rotation? In an interview with MASN’s Steve Melewski you compared Hobgood to Kevin Millwood. Again, I know Hobgood is now in the hands of Player Development, but do you know if the organization will attempt to have Hobgood spend some-time with Millwood this spring?”
Mr. Joe Jordan: “No matter where Matt pitches this year most of all he just needs to stay healthy and compete. The first full season will be not only exciting for him but also a good opportunity for our organization to truly evaluate what we have. I compare players we take every year with established ML players – no need to get Matt and K Millwood together at this point. Matt just needs to go do his work and be a part of whatever roster we decide.”
Baltimore Sports and Life: “While I respect you getting the player you wanted, I am still puzzled over the selection of Hobgood over Grant Green. The Baltimore Orioles regularly (and correctly) remind their fans that they do not have the same financial capabilities of the Red Sox, and Yankees.
When we spoke last-year, you stated you take the best player each-round, and would never sacrifice what the Orioles do, based on the resources of another organization. Based on your comments then, and with the selection of Hobgood; it appears you are stating you valued Hobgood as having the highest ceiling, based on what was available on the board. Even if you value Hobgood as more talented, does not his selection boil down to hoping everything (health, performance) goes right, so that he might have the chance to make the Majors between 2012-2013?
If you take Green, a player that had already gained the experience of 3 years of College, and performed with a wooden bat in the Cape Cod league; you are selecting a guy that should reach the Majors in 2011 (and as Gordon Beckham proved last year, maybe as early as 2010).
So again, if you have less overall resources than your competition, do not you have to A) Get a quicker return on your investment, and B) Select the player less likely to flame-out? (even if that player has less overall talent)
All of that said, I realize that I am just a blogger, that only ever saw internet-clips and Scouting Reports on these players; while you are the Scouting Director that saw these players first-hand. What aspect of this am I missing, or not considering?”
Mr. Joe Jordan: “I liked Grant Green going into the spring as a serious option for our pick at #5. Once the evaluation process ended I decided to go another way. It is valid for someone to question the decision based on any number of factors – you can do that every single year in the draft. A: the end result is far more important than how quickly we see a return on investment. B: I cannot ask for the kind of money it takes to sign these players and tell my GM/Owner (this is based on my opinion that the player is less likely to flame-out than the other guys).”
Baltimore Sports and Life: “In the 2nd-round you got HS SS Mychal Givens, who by all reports seems to be a strong athlete, with an outstanding arm. Many thought he was destined to head to Oklahoma State on scholarship, but you were able to get him signed. Did you actually see him signing the entire time? Did his age (turns 20 in May) make it harder to evaluate him? How do you think his bat will play as a professional? Where do you think he will start?”
Mr. Joe Jordan: “We had Mychal evaluated as a late 1st rnd talent. We felt comfortable all summer he would sign for fair value. That being said, since he did not play all summer he missed valuable time on the field. I believe it is likely he spends time in extended spring and plays on a short season club. We should have a better sense of his abilities later this summer. He is 20 years old and needed to play all summer instead of sitting at home – that didn’t happen so we will get him out playing and see how it goes.”
Baltimore Sports and Life: “The 3rd round pick was Florida International 1st-baseman / OF Tyler Townsend. Townsend had a .858 Slugging %, with 40 xbh’s in 212 at-bats. Your quotes after the draft made clear how much you liked the young lefty power-hitter, and how much the Delaware native wanted to be part of the Oriole organization. His scouting reports reads to me as if he is lefty-version of Reimold. Do you see that comparison? Just how excited were you to add Townsend?”
Mr. Joe Jordan: “Different type of athlete than Nolan. Obviously, we are excited about the LH bat/pwr potential from Tyler. He has a good approach and hopefully will be healthy this summer and get 400-500 ab’s. It was a good pick in the 3rd round and he should get things going this summer.”
Baltimore Sports and Life: “Can you give us some quick-hits on some of the other players you drafted, and signed? Who are you looking forward to seeing during their first professional seasons? Can you give quick hits on:
4th Randy Henry:
5th Ashur Tolliver:
6th Justin Dalles:
7th Aaron Wirsch:
9th Ryan Berry:
11th Michael Ohlman
18th Jarret Martin
22nd Cameron Coffey
30th Brenden Webb
Mr. Joe Jordan: “
Henry – pwr arm and breaking ball. Very good athlete – needs to come to camp healthy. Big potential here but needs innings.
Tolliver – Needed to pitch all summer but negotiations ate up most of it. A very quality value in the 5th round who will surprise a lot of people on how good he is.
Dalles – solid catch and throw guy with offensive potential. Needs to get out of his own way some and realize he possesses all the physical talent to play a long time.
Wirsch – Very excited with this kid – 6’05” LHP with a feel to pitch and quality to repertoire. Very advanced with approach to pitching – Will be defined by where his stuff settles in.
Berry – If healthy I expect very big things here – can really pitch!
Ohlman – paid him like I liked him a lot. Seriously, a talented, physical athlete. Made a lot of progress in Instructional League – likes to play (big upside)
Martin – In Florida already doing throwing program – feels 100% healthy. 6’03 LHP with +arm and CB – needs to stay healthy and log some innings.
Coffey – See first line on Ohlman. I temper my excitement here – all the physical talent to be anything (reminds me of Arrieta, Britton, Bergesen and those type of guys with his makeup, determination and work ethic).
Webb – another athletic, toolsy player we added to the system. A great job by our area scout, Mark Ralston. This guys talent should have put him in the top 4-5 rounds of the draft. Signed late – let’s get him out playing and see what we have.
Baltimore Sports and Life: “I believe you announced the O’s spent $8.8M on the 2009 draft-picks. Will there be a similar budget available for the draft-picks in 2010?”
Mr. Joe Jordan: “I asked for even more than that. I haven’t given the budget much thought – we have a lot of work to do from now til June. I have always been given the financial resources to sign the players we like. This year will be no different.”
Baltimore Sports and Life: “The O’s will have the 3rd overall pick in the 2010 draft. If you were going to estimate by a percentage chance, what do think the odds are that the O’s will select one of the players regularly appearing in the Top 10 of Mock Drafts now in late January? Or maybe a better question is, do think the 3rd overall selection could be a player that is in the shadows a bit with the media?”
Mr. Joe Jordan: “I believe we will take the best talent on the board with the 3rd pick. Most of the names you hear talked about in the publications are the names I believe make sense at this point.”
Baltimore Sports and Life: “Lastly, I count at-least 5 players (Berken, Hernandez, Reimold, Wieters, and Matusz) that you drafted, that made their Major League debuts during the 2009 season. How rewarding is it for you, to have brought those players to the organization, and see them ascend to the Major League team?”
Mr. Joe Jordan: “It’s the reason I do what I do. The biggest reward as a scout is to see your players make It to the Major Leagues. I am proud for all those guys and know there are more coming. “
http://baltimoresportsandlife.blogspot.com/2009/01/few-questions-with-mr-joe-jordan.html
Since that time, Mr. Jordan has seen at-least 5 more former draft-picks (Berken, Hernandez, Reimold, Wieters, and Matusz) ascend to the Majors.
In the June Amateur Draft, the Orioles selected Matt Hobgood 5th overall in the 1st round.
Baltimore Sports and Life appreciates Mr. Jordan again taking the time to answer a few questions, as we look back on 2009, and ahead to 2010.
Baltimore Sports and Life: “After you selected Matt Hobgood, you immediately stated in several interviews that the pick had zero to do with sign-ability, it was about drafting the player you had identifed as wanting. I think that is an important distinction, and I was glad to see you make that known. No matter what the Monday Morning Quarterbacks (myself included) have to say, you are the one being held responsible for the decision. I think you deserve a lot of credit for taking the player you identified, instead of taking a known ‘name’, you were less comfortable with. Can you speak to the comfort you get, in selecting the player you wanted, vs. a player you might have felt left with?”
Mr. Joe Jordan: “As a staff we put a lot of time and effort in evaluating players. It only makes sense to take the player “WE” want in each round. In the end we will make good decisions and some will not work out. I don’t worry for a second what the so called experts think – I trust the people in my draft room much more than someone from the outside evaluating our work.”
Baltimore Sports and Life: “Did you get the chance to see Hobgood in Bluefield? I know it is a decision for the Player Development Department, but do you think Hobgood will have the opportunity to start 2010 in the Delmarva rotation? In an interview with MASN’s Steve Melewski you compared Hobgood to Kevin Millwood. Again, I know Hobgood is now in the hands of Player Development, but do you know if the organization will attempt to have Hobgood spend some-time with Millwood this spring?”
Mr. Joe Jordan: “No matter where Matt pitches this year most of all he just needs to stay healthy and compete. The first full season will be not only exciting for him but also a good opportunity for our organization to truly evaluate what we have. I compare players we take every year with established ML players – no need to get Matt and K Millwood together at this point. Matt just needs to go do his work and be a part of whatever roster we decide.”
Baltimore Sports and Life: “While I respect you getting the player you wanted, I am still puzzled over the selection of Hobgood over Grant Green. The Baltimore Orioles regularly (and correctly) remind their fans that they do not have the same financial capabilities of the Red Sox, and Yankees.
When we spoke last-year, you stated you take the best player each-round, and would never sacrifice what the Orioles do, based on the resources of another organization. Based on your comments then, and with the selection of Hobgood; it appears you are stating you valued Hobgood as having the highest ceiling, based on what was available on the board. Even if you value Hobgood as more talented, does not his selection boil down to hoping everything (health, performance) goes right, so that he might have the chance to make the Majors between 2012-2013?
If you take Green, a player that had already gained the experience of 3 years of College, and performed with a wooden bat in the Cape Cod league; you are selecting a guy that should reach the Majors in 2011 (and as Gordon Beckham proved last year, maybe as early as 2010).
So again, if you have less overall resources than your competition, do not you have to A) Get a quicker return on your investment, and B) Select the player less likely to flame-out? (even if that player has less overall talent)
All of that said, I realize that I am just a blogger, that only ever saw internet-clips and Scouting Reports on these players; while you are the Scouting Director that saw these players first-hand. What aspect of this am I missing, or not considering?”
Mr. Joe Jordan: “I liked Grant Green going into the spring as a serious option for our pick at #5. Once the evaluation process ended I decided to go another way. It is valid for someone to question the decision based on any number of factors – you can do that every single year in the draft. A: the end result is far more important than how quickly we see a return on investment. B: I cannot ask for the kind of money it takes to sign these players and tell my GM/Owner (this is based on my opinion that the player is less likely to flame-out than the other guys).”
Baltimore Sports and Life: “In the 2nd-round you got HS SS Mychal Givens, who by all reports seems to be a strong athlete, with an outstanding arm. Many thought he was destined to head to Oklahoma State on scholarship, but you were able to get him signed. Did you actually see him signing the entire time? Did his age (turns 20 in May) make it harder to evaluate him? How do you think his bat will play as a professional? Where do you think he will start?”
Mr. Joe Jordan: “We had Mychal evaluated as a late 1st rnd talent. We felt comfortable all summer he would sign for fair value. That being said, since he did not play all summer he missed valuable time on the field. I believe it is likely he spends time in extended spring and plays on a short season club. We should have a better sense of his abilities later this summer. He is 20 years old and needed to play all summer instead of sitting at home – that didn’t happen so we will get him out playing and see how it goes.”
Baltimore Sports and Life: “The 3rd round pick was Florida International 1st-baseman / OF Tyler Townsend. Townsend had a .858 Slugging %, with 40 xbh’s in 212 at-bats. Your quotes after the draft made clear how much you liked the young lefty power-hitter, and how much the Delaware native wanted to be part of the Oriole organization. His scouting reports reads to me as if he is lefty-version of Reimold. Do you see that comparison? Just how excited were you to add Townsend?”
Mr. Joe Jordan: “Different type of athlete than Nolan. Obviously, we are excited about the LH bat/pwr potential from Tyler. He has a good approach and hopefully will be healthy this summer and get 400-500 ab’s. It was a good pick in the 3rd round and he should get things going this summer.”
Baltimore Sports and Life: “Can you give us some quick-hits on some of the other players you drafted, and signed? Who are you looking forward to seeing during their first professional seasons? Can you give quick hits on:
4th Randy Henry:
5th Ashur Tolliver:
6th Justin Dalles:
7th Aaron Wirsch:
9th Ryan Berry:
11th Michael Ohlman
18th Jarret Martin
22nd Cameron Coffey
30th Brenden Webb
Mr. Joe Jordan: “
Henry – pwr arm and breaking ball. Very good athlete – needs to come to camp healthy. Big potential here but needs innings.
Tolliver – Needed to pitch all summer but negotiations ate up most of it. A very quality value in the 5th round who will surprise a lot of people on how good he is.
Dalles – solid catch and throw guy with offensive potential. Needs to get out of his own way some and realize he possesses all the physical talent to play a long time.
Wirsch – Very excited with this kid – 6’05” LHP with a feel to pitch and quality to repertoire. Very advanced with approach to pitching – Will be defined by where his stuff settles in.
Berry – If healthy I expect very big things here – can really pitch!
Ohlman – paid him like I liked him a lot. Seriously, a talented, physical athlete. Made a lot of progress in Instructional League – likes to play (big upside)
Martin – In Florida already doing throwing program – feels 100% healthy. 6’03 LHP with +arm and CB – needs to stay healthy and log some innings.
Coffey – See first line on Ohlman. I temper my excitement here – all the physical talent to be anything (reminds me of Arrieta, Britton, Bergesen and those type of guys with his makeup, determination and work ethic).
Webb – another athletic, toolsy player we added to the system. A great job by our area scout, Mark Ralston. This guys talent should have put him in the top 4-5 rounds of the draft. Signed late – let’s get him out playing and see what we have.
Baltimore Sports and Life: “I believe you announced the O’s spent $8.8M on the 2009 draft-picks. Will there be a similar budget available for the draft-picks in 2010?”
Mr. Joe Jordan: “I asked for even more than that. I haven’t given the budget much thought – we have a lot of work to do from now til June. I have always been given the financial resources to sign the players we like. This year will be no different.”
Baltimore Sports and Life: “The O’s will have the 3rd overall pick in the 2010 draft. If you were going to estimate by a percentage chance, what do think the odds are that the O’s will select one of the players regularly appearing in the Top 10 of Mock Drafts now in late January? Or maybe a better question is, do think the 3rd overall selection could be a player that is in the shadows a bit with the media?”
Mr. Joe Jordan: “I believe we will take the best talent on the board with the 3rd pick. Most of the names you hear talked about in the publications are the names I believe make sense at this point.”
Baltimore Sports and Life: “Lastly, I count at-least 5 players (Berken, Hernandez, Reimold, Wieters, and Matusz) that you drafted, that made their Major League debuts during the 2009 season. How rewarding is it for you, to have brought those players to the organization, and see them ascend to the Major League team?”
Mr. Joe Jordan: “It’s the reason I do what I do. The biggest reward as a scout is to see your players make It to the Major Leagues. I am proud for all those guys and know there are more coming. “
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Q&A with Chris Knoche, Terps Radio Analyst
Last August, Mr. Chris Knoche joined Baltimore Sports and Life to preview this Terrapin Basketball season.
You can find that interview here: http://baltimoresportsandlife.blogspot.com/2009/08/few-questions-with-mr-chris-knoche.html
Mr. Knoche is in his 10th year as the Radio Analyst for the University of Maryland. Prior to that, he spent 17 years with American University, first playing under Coach Williams, and later becoming the American Head-coach himself for 7 years (1991-1997).
In addition to his work on the radio, Mr. Knoche is regularly blogging about the Terps on Comcast Sportsnet. You can find his work here:
http://www.csnwashington.com/pages/chris_knoche
Baltimore Sports and Life thanks Mr. Knoche for again taking the time to answer some questions about the Terps.
Baltimore Sports and Life: “As Maryland did not have much on the positive side of the ledger from their Out of Conference play, everyone knew the Terps were going to have to perform well within the ACC to make the tournament for the 3rd time in 4 years. The Terps have responded by starting 4-1 in league play, and obviously could be 5-0. What is your biggest takeaway from these 5 games?”
Chris Knoche: "I think my biggest takeaway would probably be the affirmation of the value of seniors and veteran leadership. Throughout the first 5 games the team has been hungry, focused and completely prepared to do whatever it takes in every game. That just doesn't happen unless you have players that truly understand the opportunity at hand."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “While the Terps lost some depth from the departure of Jin-Soo Choi, and the injury riddled Sophomore campaign of Steve Goins, it appears the team has comfortably settled into their 9 man rotation. However, as conference play progresses, are there any adjustments Coach Williams will have to make in regards to practices, or minute allocation on the court, to avoid the team wearing out?”
Chris Knoche: "While I certainly don't mean to speak ill of the departed, it was apparent that Jin Soo and Steve would probably not be a permanent part of the rotation. Simply put, the players playing are those that deserve the minutes, plain and simple. As for wearing them out, these are 19, 20, 21 year old young men in tremendous physical condition having the times of their lives right now. Fatigue is not an option."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “I find this Maryland team very enjoyable to watch. They are unselfish, and they are playing with intensity. I found the game against Miami very telling. The Hurricanes started the season 15-1, ranked among the Top 25. They had an entire week of preparation for the Terps, and should have entered the game hungry after losing 3 consecutive league games. Instead it was Maryland that won all the hustle plays, and looked like the team trying to make a statement. My thought is that Gary Williams and his staff deserve some credit for recruiting players from winning programs (Montrose Christian, Oak Hill, Lincoln, St. Frances, Mt.St.Joe, etc. etc.) that are willing to work to improve. Your thoughts?”
Chris Knoche: "I love the point about recruiting players that are used to winning. That is critical. Regarding your point about Miami, I would agree with that as well and can only imagine how upset Head Coach Frank Haith was with both the mental and physical effort in the game by his team after an entire week off. One of the things that has marked each of the Terps first 5 games is that ability to corral long rebounds and loose balls. Sean Mosley, in particular, is remarkable in this area and that's the kind of thing that will carry over."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “Even when Mosley does not receive a lot of shot-attempts, he continues to provide a positive impact with his all-around play. I knew he played in pain with his ankle injury last year, and I expected improvement; but I am surprised by just how improved he is, particularly with that intermediate jumper off the curl. He shot 37% in 4.7 Field Goal Attempts per game last year, and this year is shooting 59% in 7.6 shots attempts per game. He has raised his 3-point shooting 20%. Do you think his play will warrant mention on one of the All-Conference teams? Should he be a bit more selfish looking for his shot? Have you ever seen a player become that much more proficient shooting in one season?”
Chris Knoche: "While I did not see Sean play in high school, I would guess that this year's numbers are a lot closer to the norm than last year. After all, the guy scored 6 million points in high school so I don't think putting the ball in the hoop is a real problem for him. I think -at the minimum- he is headed for the kind of season that may put him on the ACC All-Defensive team. As for the suggestion that he be more selfish, all you have to do is look at his game...Sean just does not roll that way. He could not care less about the number of attempts he gets. Next year he'll get plenty of shots."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “The Terps strategy for success seems pretty clear at this point. They want to get out in transition, and attack the rim. Force contact and get to the line. They are limiting the 3-point attempts they take, and when those attempts are made; they are taking open looks. Tucker, and Bowie come of the bench, and most other teams are unable to match that guard depth. Gregory and Padgett need to run the court, use their athleticism to block shots, and rebound. I would think the type of team that would give Maryland the most problems going forward would be those with very strong PG play that can handle the press, and teams that are willing to play at a slow-tempo, limiting Maryland’s ability to get out and run. Do you agree? How would you attempt to Coach against the Terps?”
Chris Knoche: "Good question here. I suppose the first thing I would try to do is try and limit Grievis as much as possible. Try something different - box and one, triangle and two, double him on every ball screen. Those things are bound to happen over the next several games. There are some great coaches in the league that will do all they can to try and neutralize him. One great sign for Maryland fans is that NC State tried to do just that last weekend and, while he only got two shots in the first half, he was still the best player on the court and his team was up by double digits. Then in the second half he roasted every wolfpack player who took a shot at him."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “7.8 points, 7.8 rebounds a game for Jordan Williams. He is a presence at both ends, that looks like a potential monster to me. Your impressions?”
Chris Knoche: "Agreed 100%. He is so much better than I think most people thought he would be in this first year. He has a little "nasty" in him and will fight anybody for position on the block. He has terrific hands and will finish around the hoop. Once he adds a couple of go-to moves and works to become a little more athletic, he may very well become that monster."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “In August you mentioned that most players will play at a higher-level in 30-32 minutes a game vs. 36 or 37. Not coincidentally, Milbourne is right at that 30 minute mark, and having the strong Senior season you predicted. On most nights Milbourne gives up height, weight, and strength to his opposition. On the rare nights where his speed is not an advantage (Aminu, Lawal, etc) what is the most effective way to use him? Do you further limit his minutes, and give Gregory and Padgett a chance to body up? Do you take Milbourne further away from the basket? Similar to Mosley, will Milbourne deserve a place on one of the All-Conference teams?”
Chris Knoche: "I don't think anyone around the Maryland program is surprised about the kind of season Landon is having. His work ethic is unbelievable and he deserves success. Against Aminu and Wake Forest he did not play well for much of the game but missed a number of shots he normally makes and came back to hit two big jumpers down the stretch. The ONLY thing that will probably ever limit his minutes would be foul trouble. Other than that he needs to be on the floor. His uncanny ability to nail 15 footers is one of the things that gives the other players the room they need to operate. As for the All Conference thing...if the team continues to play at this level, it will be hard to deny him a spot somewhere."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “Do you get the sense this team has reached their ceiling, or do you see this team continuing to build? Any predictions for how Maryland will end the regular season, and what you think they are capable of come March?”
Chris Knoche: "They still have a number of places where they can improve - transition defense, free throw shooting, rebounding on both ends, etc. As a Gary Williams team they will not ever be allowed to think that they are anywhere close that ceiling. As for predictions, I'm just not very good at them. Too often I think that fans and the media refuse to let seasons play out and are ready to completely trash a team in January (witness 2009 edition of Maryland basketball) or are ready to crown someone playing well early in the season (Miami was 15-1 just two weeks ago)."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “Based on what you have seen, what do you think of the ACC as a whole this year?”
Chris Knoche: "We have not seen every team live and up front but I'd say there's some good balance without any of the superpowers we've been used to seeing. There are a lot of good teams...nothing that will make you afraid to play 'em."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “Plenty of this season left to play, but it is always fun to look ahead. Based on currently known departures, and arrivals, we are looking at a 2010-11 Maryland team that could look like:
1) Bowie, Stoglin
2) Tucker, Howard
3) Mosley, Parker
4) Padgett, Pankey
5) Williams, Gregory, Goins
Even if Bowie is not a true PG, his experience, size, quickness, and ability to drive should position him to start as the lead guard. Having Stoglin, and Howard available to back him up as ball-handlers should help. Mosley and Williams will have plenty of experience, and should be ready to contribute as the focal points of the team. Gregory, Padgett, and Pankey can be expected to again provide athleticism, rebounding, and a defensive presence. I see Bowie, and Tucker being capable of Senior seasons which are similar to the Senior Season of Drew Nicholas. Players that gained a lot of experience their first 3 seasons, and flourished in a starting slot to end their career. Thoughts on them, and an early preview of what you are looking forward to next-season?"
Chris Knoche: "Jeez, you won't even let us enjoy watching this season play out?? Just kidding - looking ahead like that is one of the fun parts about college hoops. The parts do change every season! I would love to compare Adrian or Cliff to Drew Nicholas but that's unfair. Drew played behind two of the great guards to ever wear the uniform in Blake and Dixon. You had the feeling that, given the chance, he could play that way. There is no doubt that both of them are capable enough to do it.One of the really cool things about watching guys is to see the incremental improvement in their play. The jump in a guy's development between his freshman and sophomore seasons, for example, can be a night and day thing. We're seeing it in Sean Mosley now. Maybe Jordan Williams and/or James Padgett can do something similar for next season."
You can find that interview here: http://baltimoresportsandlife.blogspot.com/2009/08/few-questions-with-mr-chris-knoche.html
Mr. Knoche is in his 10th year as the Radio Analyst for the University of Maryland. Prior to that, he spent 17 years with American University, first playing under Coach Williams, and later becoming the American Head-coach himself for 7 years (1991-1997).
In addition to his work on the radio, Mr. Knoche is regularly blogging about the Terps on Comcast Sportsnet. You can find his work here:
http://www.csnwashington.com/pages/chris_knoche
Baltimore Sports and Life thanks Mr. Knoche for again taking the time to answer some questions about the Terps.
Baltimore Sports and Life: “As Maryland did not have much on the positive side of the ledger from their Out of Conference play, everyone knew the Terps were going to have to perform well within the ACC to make the tournament for the 3rd time in 4 years. The Terps have responded by starting 4-1 in league play, and obviously could be 5-0. What is your biggest takeaway from these 5 games?”
Chris Knoche: "I think my biggest takeaway would probably be the affirmation of the value of seniors and veteran leadership. Throughout the first 5 games the team has been hungry, focused and completely prepared to do whatever it takes in every game. That just doesn't happen unless you have players that truly understand the opportunity at hand."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “While the Terps lost some depth from the departure of Jin-Soo Choi, and the injury riddled Sophomore campaign of Steve Goins, it appears the team has comfortably settled into their 9 man rotation. However, as conference play progresses, are there any adjustments Coach Williams will have to make in regards to practices, or minute allocation on the court, to avoid the team wearing out?”
Chris Knoche: "While I certainly don't mean to speak ill of the departed, it was apparent that Jin Soo and Steve would probably not be a permanent part of the rotation. Simply put, the players playing are those that deserve the minutes, plain and simple. As for wearing them out, these are 19, 20, 21 year old young men in tremendous physical condition having the times of their lives right now. Fatigue is not an option."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “I find this Maryland team very enjoyable to watch. They are unselfish, and they are playing with intensity. I found the game against Miami very telling. The Hurricanes started the season 15-1, ranked among the Top 25. They had an entire week of preparation for the Terps, and should have entered the game hungry after losing 3 consecutive league games. Instead it was Maryland that won all the hustle plays, and looked like the team trying to make a statement. My thought is that Gary Williams and his staff deserve some credit for recruiting players from winning programs (Montrose Christian, Oak Hill, Lincoln, St. Frances, Mt.St.Joe, etc. etc.) that are willing to work to improve. Your thoughts?”
Chris Knoche: "I love the point about recruiting players that are used to winning. That is critical. Regarding your point about Miami, I would agree with that as well and can only imagine how upset Head Coach Frank Haith was with both the mental and physical effort in the game by his team after an entire week off. One of the things that has marked each of the Terps first 5 games is that ability to corral long rebounds and loose balls. Sean Mosley, in particular, is remarkable in this area and that's the kind of thing that will carry over."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “Even when Mosley does not receive a lot of shot-attempts, he continues to provide a positive impact with his all-around play. I knew he played in pain with his ankle injury last year, and I expected improvement; but I am surprised by just how improved he is, particularly with that intermediate jumper off the curl. He shot 37% in 4.7 Field Goal Attempts per game last year, and this year is shooting 59% in 7.6 shots attempts per game. He has raised his 3-point shooting 20%. Do you think his play will warrant mention on one of the All-Conference teams? Should he be a bit more selfish looking for his shot? Have you ever seen a player become that much more proficient shooting in one season?”
Chris Knoche: "While I did not see Sean play in high school, I would guess that this year's numbers are a lot closer to the norm than last year. After all, the guy scored 6 million points in high school so I don't think putting the ball in the hoop is a real problem for him. I think -at the minimum- he is headed for the kind of season that may put him on the ACC All-Defensive team. As for the suggestion that he be more selfish, all you have to do is look at his game...Sean just does not roll that way. He could not care less about the number of attempts he gets. Next year he'll get plenty of shots."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “The Terps strategy for success seems pretty clear at this point. They want to get out in transition, and attack the rim. Force contact and get to the line. They are limiting the 3-point attempts they take, and when those attempts are made; they are taking open looks. Tucker, and Bowie come of the bench, and most other teams are unable to match that guard depth. Gregory and Padgett need to run the court, use their athleticism to block shots, and rebound. I would think the type of team that would give Maryland the most problems going forward would be those with very strong PG play that can handle the press, and teams that are willing to play at a slow-tempo, limiting Maryland’s ability to get out and run. Do you agree? How would you attempt to Coach against the Terps?”
Chris Knoche: "Good question here. I suppose the first thing I would try to do is try and limit Grievis as much as possible. Try something different - box and one, triangle and two, double him on every ball screen. Those things are bound to happen over the next several games. There are some great coaches in the league that will do all they can to try and neutralize him. One great sign for Maryland fans is that NC State tried to do just that last weekend and, while he only got two shots in the first half, he was still the best player on the court and his team was up by double digits. Then in the second half he roasted every wolfpack player who took a shot at him."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “7.8 points, 7.8 rebounds a game for Jordan Williams. He is a presence at both ends, that looks like a potential monster to me. Your impressions?”
Chris Knoche: "Agreed 100%. He is so much better than I think most people thought he would be in this first year. He has a little "nasty" in him and will fight anybody for position on the block. He has terrific hands and will finish around the hoop. Once he adds a couple of go-to moves and works to become a little more athletic, he may very well become that monster."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “In August you mentioned that most players will play at a higher-level in 30-32 minutes a game vs. 36 or 37. Not coincidentally, Milbourne is right at that 30 minute mark, and having the strong Senior season you predicted. On most nights Milbourne gives up height, weight, and strength to his opposition. On the rare nights where his speed is not an advantage (Aminu, Lawal, etc) what is the most effective way to use him? Do you further limit his minutes, and give Gregory and Padgett a chance to body up? Do you take Milbourne further away from the basket? Similar to Mosley, will Milbourne deserve a place on one of the All-Conference teams?”
Chris Knoche: "I don't think anyone around the Maryland program is surprised about the kind of season Landon is having. His work ethic is unbelievable and he deserves success. Against Aminu and Wake Forest he did not play well for much of the game but missed a number of shots he normally makes and came back to hit two big jumpers down the stretch. The ONLY thing that will probably ever limit his minutes would be foul trouble. Other than that he needs to be on the floor. His uncanny ability to nail 15 footers is one of the things that gives the other players the room they need to operate. As for the All Conference thing...if the team continues to play at this level, it will be hard to deny him a spot somewhere."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “Do you get the sense this team has reached their ceiling, or do you see this team continuing to build? Any predictions for how Maryland will end the regular season, and what you think they are capable of come March?”
Chris Knoche: "They still have a number of places where they can improve - transition defense, free throw shooting, rebounding on both ends, etc. As a Gary Williams team they will not ever be allowed to think that they are anywhere close that ceiling. As for predictions, I'm just not very good at them. Too often I think that fans and the media refuse to let seasons play out and are ready to completely trash a team in January (witness 2009 edition of Maryland basketball) or are ready to crown someone playing well early in the season (Miami was 15-1 just two weeks ago)."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “Based on what you have seen, what do you think of the ACC as a whole this year?”
Chris Knoche: "We have not seen every team live and up front but I'd say there's some good balance without any of the superpowers we've been used to seeing. There are a lot of good teams...nothing that will make you afraid to play 'em."
Baltimore Sports and Life: “Plenty of this season left to play, but it is always fun to look ahead. Based on currently known departures, and arrivals, we are looking at a 2010-11 Maryland team that could look like:
1) Bowie, Stoglin
2) Tucker, Howard
3) Mosley, Parker
4) Padgett, Pankey
5) Williams, Gregory, Goins
Even if Bowie is not a true PG, his experience, size, quickness, and ability to drive should position him to start as the lead guard. Having Stoglin, and Howard available to back him up as ball-handlers should help. Mosley and Williams will have plenty of experience, and should be ready to contribute as the focal points of the team. Gregory, Padgett, and Pankey can be expected to again provide athleticism, rebounding, and a defensive presence. I see Bowie, and Tucker being capable of Senior seasons which are similar to the Senior Season of Drew Nicholas. Players that gained a lot of experience their first 3 seasons, and flourished in a starting slot to end their career. Thoughts on them, and an early preview of what you are looking forward to next-season?"
Chris Knoche: "Jeez, you won't even let us enjoy watching this season play out?? Just kidding - looking ahead like that is one of the fun parts about college hoops. The parts do change every season! I would love to compare Adrian or Cliff to Drew Nicholas but that's unfair. Drew played behind two of the great guards to ever wear the uniform in Blake and Dixon. You had the feeling that, given the chance, he could play that way. There is no doubt that both of them are capable enough to do it.One of the really cool things about watching guys is to see the incremental improvement in their play. The jump in a guy's development between his freshman and sophomore seasons, for example, can be a night and day thing. We're seeing it in Sean Mosley now. Maybe Jordan Williams and/or James Padgett can do something similar for next season."
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Terps overpower Miami; The Good, The Bad, The Ugly
The University of Maryland beat the Miami Hurricanes 81-59, gaining sole possession of 1st-place in the Atlantic Coast Conference.
The Terrapins are now 14-5 overall, and 4-1 in the ACC. They have won their past three conference games by an average of 21 points.
The Good:
1) While the Hurricanes have now lost 4 consecutive ACC games, they started this season 15-1, and ranked among the National Top 25. Miami had a full-week off in preparation for this game. While winning on the road in conference play is always difficult, it says a lot about the Terps that Maryland won all the hustle plays, and looked like the hungrier team.
2) Four Terps scored in double-figures, and seven scored at-least 8 points.
3) Maryland had 19 assists, 7 steals, forced 18 turnovers, and were even with Miami on the boards.
4) 42 points in the paint for the Terps tonight, helped propel Maryland to shooting 51% from the field. When the Terps took 3 point attempts, they got good looks and buried 7 of their 15 shots. Maryland was again able to force foul-shots, getting to the line 25 times.
5) Besides the steals, and turnovers forced with Maryland's pressure defense; the Terps also competed in 1/2 court-sets. Miami was limited to just 38% from the field.
6) It is amazing how much Mosley impacts games, even when he gets only a few shots. 10 points tonight on 3 for 5 from the floor, 7 boards, 3 assists, 3 steals. He is playing at a very high-level, and you can see his confidence growing every game.
7) Milbourne was 7 of 9 against Longwood, 7 of 11 against NCST, and 7 of 10 tonight against Miami. All year, he has done a good job of fighting to score inside, hitting his intermediate jumper, and hitting from the outside (42%). It seems to me that since the closing moments of the W&M loss, that Milbourne has raised his intensity to a whole other-level.
8) Another game where Jordan Williams gave Maryland exactly what they need inside. 8 points, 6 boards, 2 steals, and a block. He is a force at both ends.
9) James Padgett got 8 minutes tonight, which was good to see. Unlike in the NCST game, Gary Williams used a blow-out situation to give Padgett some extended minutes. Padgett responded with 3 boards in that limited time.
10) Two more 3's for Hayes tonight, who also had 4 assists, 0 turnovers, and a steal. 5 games into conference play, and Hayes is still shooting over 46% from 3.
11) After just 11 minutes against NCST, Bowie had 17 minutes tonight, and responded with 9 points. He would have had more if he had not missed all 3 of his Free Throws.
The Bad:
1) Give Gregory credit for making 2 of his 3 shots, and all 4 of his FT's. Dock Gregory for playing 14 minutes, and not having a rebound. Any point Gregory scores is a bonus, he has to give rebounding to this team off the bench.
The Ugly:
1) None. If Maryland continues to win ACC games by an average of 20 points, I am going to have end 'The Good, The Bad, The Ugly.' How can you critique something as ugly, when you are dominating conference games?
Up-Next:
Maryland will get a stiffer-test this Sunday when they take the floor at Littlejohn to face the Clemson Tigers. After suffering a tough defeat at-home to Duke this past weekend, Clemson went on the road tonight, and lost at Boston College.
That is a reminder of two things: 1) It typically is very tough for anyone to win on the road in this conference. 2) You have to be mentally focused every-game.
The Terps have played 5 conference-games, and shown a focus every time-out. After losing the tough OT game at Wake Forest, Maryland responded with the blow-out win at Boston College.
If the Terps can win Sunday night in Clemson, you can expect Maryland to really start turning heads at the National level.
The Terrapins are now 14-5 overall, and 4-1 in the ACC. They have won their past three conference games by an average of 21 points.
The Good:
1) While the Hurricanes have now lost 4 consecutive ACC games, they started this season 15-1, and ranked among the National Top 25. Miami had a full-week off in preparation for this game. While winning on the road in conference play is always difficult, it says a lot about the Terps that Maryland won all the hustle plays, and looked like the hungrier team.
2) Four Terps scored in double-figures, and seven scored at-least 8 points.
3) Maryland had 19 assists, 7 steals, forced 18 turnovers, and were even with Miami on the boards.
4) 42 points in the paint for the Terps tonight, helped propel Maryland to shooting 51% from the field. When the Terps took 3 point attempts, they got good looks and buried 7 of their 15 shots. Maryland was again able to force foul-shots, getting to the line 25 times.
5) Besides the steals, and turnovers forced with Maryland's pressure defense; the Terps also competed in 1/2 court-sets. Miami was limited to just 38% from the field.
6) It is amazing how much Mosley impacts games, even when he gets only a few shots. 10 points tonight on 3 for 5 from the floor, 7 boards, 3 assists, 3 steals. He is playing at a very high-level, and you can see his confidence growing every game.
7) Milbourne was 7 of 9 against Longwood, 7 of 11 against NCST, and 7 of 10 tonight against Miami. All year, he has done a good job of fighting to score inside, hitting his intermediate jumper, and hitting from the outside (42%). It seems to me that since the closing moments of the W&M loss, that Milbourne has raised his intensity to a whole other-level.
8) Another game where Jordan Williams gave Maryland exactly what they need inside. 8 points, 6 boards, 2 steals, and a block. He is a force at both ends.
9) James Padgett got 8 minutes tonight, which was good to see. Unlike in the NCST game, Gary Williams used a blow-out situation to give Padgett some extended minutes. Padgett responded with 3 boards in that limited time.
10) Two more 3's for Hayes tonight, who also had 4 assists, 0 turnovers, and a steal. 5 games into conference play, and Hayes is still shooting over 46% from 3.
11) After just 11 minutes against NCST, Bowie had 17 minutes tonight, and responded with 9 points. He would have had more if he had not missed all 3 of his Free Throws.
The Bad:
1) Give Gregory credit for making 2 of his 3 shots, and all 4 of his FT's. Dock Gregory for playing 14 minutes, and not having a rebound. Any point Gregory scores is a bonus, he has to give rebounding to this team off the bench.
The Ugly:
1) None. If Maryland continues to win ACC games by an average of 20 points, I am going to have end 'The Good, The Bad, The Ugly.' How can you critique something as ugly, when you are dominating conference games?
Up-Next:
Maryland will get a stiffer-test this Sunday when they take the floor at Littlejohn to face the Clemson Tigers. After suffering a tough defeat at-home to Duke this past weekend, Clemson went on the road tonight, and lost at Boston College.
That is a reminder of two things: 1) It typically is very tough for anyone to win on the road in this conference. 2) You have to be mentally focused every-game.
The Terps have played 5 conference-games, and shown a focus every time-out. After losing the tough OT game at Wake Forest, Maryland responded with the blow-out win at Boston College.
If the Terps can win Sunday night in Clemson, you can expect Maryland to really start turning heads at the National level.
Sunday, January 24, 2010
Projecting the Orioles Opening Day Roster
The signing of Tejada, just further cements the roster we are likely looking at to start the 2010 Season.
Spring Training might alter the team some, but that change would likely be through attrition (injuries) as opposed to performance.
There are a group of players which are definitive locks to make the team:
Infield: C Wieters, 1st Atkins, 2nd Roberts, SS Izturis, 3rd Tejada
Outfield: LF Reimold, CF Jones, RF Markakis
DH: Scott
Bench: Wiggintion, Pie
Rotation: Millwood, Matusz, Guthrie, Bergesen
Bullpen: Gonzalez, Johnson, Uehara
That is a total of 18 players, with 7 roster spots in question.
At times during the past several years, the O's have shown a willingness to carry 13 pitchers, which limited the bench to just 3 members. As this Oriole team will have a limit of players you pinch hit for - and Tejada is capable of backing up SS - I could see the O's Front Office brass again considering that option.
I think a 3 man bench severely handicaps a team, and that a 13th pitcher has very limited worth. The pitching staff should be improved to the point where carrying another pitcher is just not needed.
So if you are going to carry a 4th bench player, who are the options, and what do you need?
The likely candidates for that last spot on the roster would be Aubrey, Montanez, Andino, Turner, Moore, Hughes, and Blake Davis.
If you are Robert Andino, or Blake Davis; you wake up this morning a bit more apprehensive about your chances of making the team. If they were to make the roster, their primary position would be to serve as a back-up SS. With Tejada now on the roster, having a dedicated backup SS becomes redundant. You could argue that a backup SS still has some value, if the O's (and Tejada) show a non-willingness to move between 3rd and SS during the season. You could also argue that the only player in the everyday lineup you would regularly pinch-hit for is Izturis. If you are pinch hitting for him, it is possible you want to replace him the field with another capable defensive player.
If Turner or Scott Moore were to show an ability in Spring Training to also be capable of backing-up at SS, their versatility, and better bats would vault them over Andino, and Davis.
I do not see John (Ryhne) Hughes really having the chance to make the O's, but he had 63 XBH's between AA, and AAA last year. The lefty turned 26 in September, seems likely to head back to Norfolk, but if the O's wanted some pop off the bench that could share time with Atkins at 1st, he would provide an option.
I think Montanez, and Aubrey go into Spring Training with the benefit of the O's having positive memories of each at the Major League level. That said, Montanez faces the problem that Reimold, Jones, and Markakis are going to play everyday, that Pie is going to be the 4th OF, and that Scott gives the roster a 5th OF if needed. If you go with Montanez as the 25th player on the roster, it is because you can use him at a multitude of positions, and because you believe you can find use for his bat off the bench.
Aubrey showed well in his 90 at-bats with the O's, he is left-handed, and they like his defense. That seems like the recipe for a dedicated back-up role to Atkins at 1st. Also, as the Orioles will want Snyder playing everyday at AAA, sending Aubrey back to the Minors would just clog things up for the Norfolk roster. I guess all of this is a long-winded way of saying I think Aubrey makes the Opening Day roster.
That means the bench is Wigginton, Pie, Aubrey, with a backup catcher needed. It is pretty clear that Chad Moeller has this job of today. He was invited as the non-roster invitee, and the team loves his makeup and defensive abilities. If the O's think Moeller's knowledge of the game, and ability to mentor Wieters (and the pitching staff) means more than carrying a backup catcher with offensive capability; I can live with that.
I had suggested that Yorvit Torrealba could have some value, but frankly as I look closer at their numbers, there is no real benefit there. Consider Moeller a lock unless another Winter has considerably slowed the to be 35 year-old.
So, with Aubrey, and Moeller identified, we are now up to 20 players, with 5 needed. Obviously, these are all arms we are talking about.
Let us start with the 5th starter. To me, I should be able to list Tillman as an absolute definitive lock to make the team. It is going to be difficult to convince me that he has more to prove in the Minors. However, I think there are signs the O's are thinking of handling Tillman like Tampa handled David Price to start 2009. I think it is possible they send Tillman back to Norfolk with the idea of him coming-up by the end of May.
If nobody was added to roster externally, I think Tillman goes to camp and wins that job if it is a fair competition. If the O's already have the mindset that Tillman will be going back to AAA, Berken, and Hernandez become candidates to start the year in the rotation.
If the O's sign Bedard -and Bedard is ready to pitch to start the year - Tillman goes back to AAA, unless there is an injury to Matusz or Bergesen, or Guthrie is traded.
In late-January my best guesstimate of what happens is that Bedard is signed, and Tillman still makes the Major League team. I think Bedard will be signed, and they will go slow with him, hoping to have him back in an Oriole uniform by June 1st.
If I am right, and Tillman grabs that 5th spot in the rotation, that means we are up to 21 players, with 4 spots needed in the bullpen.
As I said above, Gonzalez, Johnson, and Uehara are locks to make the pen. If Tillman is in the rotation, that means Berken, and Hernandez are not. The O's will have the option of sending them back to the Minors and letting them start everyday. I imagine some within the organization, would prefer that.
Myself, I think adding them to the back of the bullpen, is a real potential strength for the Birds. These arms that should be capable of providing you with a lot of outings, and innings from the pen. Used to going against both lefties, and righties, you do not have to use them as situational pitchers. If I am making the roster, both of them make the 2010 team.
So this leaves two spots open. Already existing are the following candidates:
Mickolio
Albers
Meredith
Sarfate
Simon
The biggest thing going against these 5 pitchers, is that each of them is right-handed, and it seems pretty clear that the O's are going to attempt to bring back Hendrickson as another lefty. Even if Hendrickson is not added, I would bet that one of the other Free Agent lefties are:
Will Ohman:
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/player...?playerId=4563
2009: 21 games, 12.1 innings, 12 hits, 8 er, 4 homers, 8 walks, 7 k's
2008: 83 games, 58.2 innings, 51 hits, 24 er, 3 homers, 22 walks, 53 k's, .636 OPS against
Ron Mahay
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/player...?playerId=3235
2009: 57 games, 50.1 innings, 62 hits, 24 er, 10 homers, 22 walks, 42 k's, .878 OPS against
Ron Villone
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/player...?playerId=3186
Scott Schoeneweis
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/player...?playerId=4010
I personally think four of the pitchers existing internally (Mickoilo, Albers, Meredith, Sarfate) have more upside than Hendrickson or these other lefties. However, if Gonzalez is closing, I see little chance the O's leave Trembley without an additional lefty option from the pen.
My guess is that Sarfate and Simon get looks, but that neither are going to make this team. Meredith appeared in 80 games in 2007, 73 games in 2008, and 64 games in 2009. That durability will make him attractive to the team. However, if Albers comes to camp in good condition, and the rest/rehab of winter has further strengthened his arm; I would think Albers has the edge to Meredith due to pure stuff.
As much as l like the stuff of Albers as a reliever, he does not have anything on Mickolio in terms of ability. I sense that there will be a lot of eyes on Mickolio in camp to determine if there has been a maturation for the soon to be 26 year-old.
All things being equal, I would think Mickolio makes the team. For Albers and Meredith to make the team, I believe it is going to take either an injury to Uehara / Berken / Hernandez, or a desire from the O's to send Berken or Hernandez to AAA for more starts.
If you have been following along, this leaves me looking at a 25 man Opening Day roster of:
Infield: C Wieters, 1st Atkins, 2nd Roberts, SS Izturis, 3rd Tejada
Outfield: LF Reimold, CF Jones, RF Markakis
DH: Scott
Bench: Wiggintion, Pie, Aubrey, Moeller
Rotation: Millwood, Matusz, Guthrie, Bergesen, Tillman
Bullpen: Gonzalez, Johnson, Uehara, Mickolio, Hendrickson / FA Lefty, Berken, Hernandez
My everyday line-up would be:
Roberts 2nd
Reimold LF
Markakis RF
Wieters C
Jones CF
Scott DH
Tejada 3rd
Atkins 1st
Izturis SS
I imagine the O's will likely not want Wieters to start the year batting cleanup, and will have Tejada much further up the lineup. Either way is livable, as this team is going to score some runs regardless.
This is a pretty solid team with depth (even extending to the Minors with Arrieta, Bell and Snyder) and versatility. There is no reason why this team should not be expected to flirt with .500 in 2010.
Spring Training might alter the team some, but that change would likely be through attrition (injuries) as opposed to performance.
There are a group of players which are definitive locks to make the team:
Infield: C Wieters, 1st Atkins, 2nd Roberts, SS Izturis, 3rd Tejada
Outfield: LF Reimold, CF Jones, RF Markakis
DH: Scott
Bench: Wiggintion, Pie
Rotation: Millwood, Matusz, Guthrie, Bergesen
Bullpen: Gonzalez, Johnson, Uehara
That is a total of 18 players, with 7 roster spots in question.
At times during the past several years, the O's have shown a willingness to carry 13 pitchers, which limited the bench to just 3 members. As this Oriole team will have a limit of players you pinch hit for - and Tejada is capable of backing up SS - I could see the O's Front Office brass again considering that option.
I think a 3 man bench severely handicaps a team, and that a 13th pitcher has very limited worth. The pitching staff should be improved to the point where carrying another pitcher is just not needed.
So if you are going to carry a 4th bench player, who are the options, and what do you need?
The likely candidates for that last spot on the roster would be Aubrey, Montanez, Andino, Turner, Moore, Hughes, and Blake Davis.
If you are Robert Andino, or Blake Davis; you wake up this morning a bit more apprehensive about your chances of making the team. If they were to make the roster, their primary position would be to serve as a back-up SS. With Tejada now on the roster, having a dedicated backup SS becomes redundant. You could argue that a backup SS still has some value, if the O's (and Tejada) show a non-willingness to move between 3rd and SS during the season. You could also argue that the only player in the everyday lineup you would regularly pinch-hit for is Izturis. If you are pinch hitting for him, it is possible you want to replace him the field with another capable defensive player.
If Turner or Scott Moore were to show an ability in Spring Training to also be capable of backing-up at SS, their versatility, and better bats would vault them over Andino, and Davis.
I do not see John (Ryhne) Hughes really having the chance to make the O's, but he had 63 XBH's between AA, and AAA last year. The lefty turned 26 in September, seems likely to head back to Norfolk, but if the O's wanted some pop off the bench that could share time with Atkins at 1st, he would provide an option.
I think Montanez, and Aubrey go into Spring Training with the benefit of the O's having positive memories of each at the Major League level. That said, Montanez faces the problem that Reimold, Jones, and Markakis are going to play everyday, that Pie is going to be the 4th OF, and that Scott gives the roster a 5th OF if needed. If you go with Montanez as the 25th player on the roster, it is because you can use him at a multitude of positions, and because you believe you can find use for his bat off the bench.
Aubrey showed well in his 90 at-bats with the O's, he is left-handed, and they like his defense. That seems like the recipe for a dedicated back-up role to Atkins at 1st. Also, as the Orioles will want Snyder playing everyday at AAA, sending Aubrey back to the Minors would just clog things up for the Norfolk roster. I guess all of this is a long-winded way of saying I think Aubrey makes the Opening Day roster.
That means the bench is Wigginton, Pie, Aubrey, with a backup catcher needed. It is pretty clear that Chad Moeller has this job of today. He was invited as the non-roster invitee, and the team loves his makeup and defensive abilities. If the O's think Moeller's knowledge of the game, and ability to mentor Wieters (and the pitching staff) means more than carrying a backup catcher with offensive capability; I can live with that.
I had suggested that Yorvit Torrealba could have some value, but frankly as I look closer at their numbers, there is no real benefit there. Consider Moeller a lock unless another Winter has considerably slowed the to be 35 year-old.
So, with Aubrey, and Moeller identified, we are now up to 20 players, with 5 needed. Obviously, these are all arms we are talking about.
Let us start with the 5th starter. To me, I should be able to list Tillman as an absolute definitive lock to make the team. It is going to be difficult to convince me that he has more to prove in the Minors. However, I think there are signs the O's are thinking of handling Tillman like Tampa handled David Price to start 2009. I think it is possible they send Tillman back to Norfolk with the idea of him coming-up by the end of May.
If nobody was added to roster externally, I think Tillman goes to camp and wins that job if it is a fair competition. If the O's already have the mindset that Tillman will be going back to AAA, Berken, and Hernandez become candidates to start the year in the rotation.
If the O's sign Bedard -and Bedard is ready to pitch to start the year - Tillman goes back to AAA, unless there is an injury to Matusz or Bergesen, or Guthrie is traded.
In late-January my best guesstimate of what happens is that Bedard is signed, and Tillman still makes the Major League team. I think Bedard will be signed, and they will go slow with him, hoping to have him back in an Oriole uniform by June 1st.
If I am right, and Tillman grabs that 5th spot in the rotation, that means we are up to 21 players, with 4 spots needed in the bullpen.
As I said above, Gonzalez, Johnson, and Uehara are locks to make the pen. If Tillman is in the rotation, that means Berken, and Hernandez are not. The O's will have the option of sending them back to the Minors and letting them start everyday. I imagine some within the organization, would prefer that.
Myself, I think adding them to the back of the bullpen, is a real potential strength for the Birds. These arms that should be capable of providing you with a lot of outings, and innings from the pen. Used to going against both lefties, and righties, you do not have to use them as situational pitchers. If I am making the roster, both of them make the 2010 team.
So this leaves two spots open. Already existing are the following candidates:
Mickolio
Albers
Meredith
Sarfate
Simon
The biggest thing going against these 5 pitchers, is that each of them is right-handed, and it seems pretty clear that the O's are going to attempt to bring back Hendrickson as another lefty. Even if Hendrickson is not added, I would bet that one of the other Free Agent lefties are:
Will Ohman:
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/player...?playerId=4563
2009: 21 games, 12.1 innings, 12 hits, 8 er, 4 homers, 8 walks, 7 k's
2008: 83 games, 58.2 innings, 51 hits, 24 er, 3 homers, 22 walks, 53 k's, .636 OPS against
Ron Mahay
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/player...?playerId=3235
2009: 57 games, 50.1 innings, 62 hits, 24 er, 10 homers, 22 walks, 42 k's, .878 OPS against
Ron Villone
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/player...?playerId=3186
Scott Schoeneweis
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/player...?playerId=4010
I personally think four of the pitchers existing internally (Mickoilo, Albers, Meredith, Sarfate) have more upside than Hendrickson or these other lefties. However, if Gonzalez is closing, I see little chance the O's leave Trembley without an additional lefty option from the pen.
My guess is that Sarfate and Simon get looks, but that neither are going to make this team. Meredith appeared in 80 games in 2007, 73 games in 2008, and 64 games in 2009. That durability will make him attractive to the team. However, if Albers comes to camp in good condition, and the rest/rehab of winter has further strengthened his arm; I would think Albers has the edge to Meredith due to pure stuff.
As much as l like the stuff of Albers as a reliever, he does not have anything on Mickolio in terms of ability. I sense that there will be a lot of eyes on Mickolio in camp to determine if there has been a maturation for the soon to be 26 year-old.
All things being equal, I would think Mickolio makes the team. For Albers and Meredith to make the team, I believe it is going to take either an injury to Uehara / Berken / Hernandez, or a desire from the O's to send Berken or Hernandez to AAA for more starts.
If you have been following along, this leaves me looking at a 25 man Opening Day roster of:
Infield: C Wieters, 1st Atkins, 2nd Roberts, SS Izturis, 3rd Tejada
Outfield: LF Reimold, CF Jones, RF Markakis
DH: Scott
Bench: Wiggintion, Pie, Aubrey, Moeller
Rotation: Millwood, Matusz, Guthrie, Bergesen, Tillman
Bullpen: Gonzalez, Johnson, Uehara, Mickolio, Hendrickson / FA Lefty, Berken, Hernandez
My everyday line-up would be:
Roberts 2nd
Reimold LF
Markakis RF
Wieters C
Jones CF
Scott DH
Tejada 3rd
Atkins 1st
Izturis SS
I imagine the O's will likely not want Wieters to start the year batting cleanup, and will have Tejada much further up the lineup. Either way is livable, as this team is going to score some runs regardless.
This is a pretty solid team with depth (even extending to the Minors with Arrieta, Bell and Snyder) and versatility. There is no reason why this team should not be expected to flirt with .500 in 2010.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
